{"id":798905,"date":"2021-08-25T12:29:54","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T12:29:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/2021\/08\/25\/s-korea-parliament-committee-votes-to-curb-google-apple-commission-dominance\/"},"modified":"2021-08-25T12:29:54","modified_gmt":"2021-08-25T12:29:54","slug":"s-korea-parliament-committee-votes-to-curb-google-apple-commission-dominance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/2021\/08\/25\/s-korea-parliament-committee-votes-to-curb-google-apple-commission-dominance\/","title":{"rendered":"S.Korea parliament committee votes to curb Google, Apple commission dominance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A South Korean parliamentary committee voted early on Wednesday to recommend amending a law, a key step toward banning Google and Apple from forcibly charging software developers commissions on in-app purchases, the first such curb by a major economy.<\/p>\n<p>After the vote from the legislation and judiciary committee to amend the Telecommunications Business Act, dubbed the &#8220;Anti-Google law,&#8221; the amendment will come to a final vote in parliament.<\/p>\n<p>That vote could come on Wednesday, although South Korean news agency Yonhap reported that parliament would act at a later date.<\/p>\n<p>A parliament official told Reuters the office had not yet received an official request not to hold the meeting on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc&#8217;s Google have both faced global criticism because they require software developers using their app stores to use proprietary payment systems that charge commissions of up to 30%.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement on Tuesday, Apple said the bill &#8220;will put users who purchase digital goods from other sources at risk of fraud, undermine their privacy protections&#8221;, hurt user trust in App Store purchases and lead to fewer opportunities for South Korean developers.<\/p>\n<p>Wilson White, senior director of public policy at Google, said &#8220;the rushed process hasn&#8217;t allowed for enough analysis of the negative impact of this legislation on Korean consumers and app developers&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Legal experts said app store operators could work with developers and other companies to create secure payment methods other than the ones they provide.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Google and Apple aren&#8217;t the only ones that can create a secure payment system,&#8221; said Lee Hwang, a Korea University School of Law professor specialising in competition law. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s a problem to try to inspire excessive fear by talking about safety or security about using different payment methods.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Based on South Korean parliament records, the amendment bans app store operators with dominant market positions from forcing payment systems on content providers and &#8220;inappropriately&#8221; delaying the review of, or deleting, mobile contents from app markets.<\/p>\n<p>It also allows the South Korean government to require an app market operator to &#8220;prevent damage to users and protect the rights and interests of users&#8221;, probe app market operators, and mediate disputes regarding payment, cancellations or refunds in the app market.<\/p>\n<p>This month in the United States, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a bill that would rein in app stores of companies that they said exert too much market control, including Apple and Google.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A South Korean parliamentary committee voted early on Wednesday to recommend amending a law, a key step toward banning Google and Apple from forcibly charging software developers commissions on in-app purchases, the first such curb by a major economy. After the vote from the legislation and judiciary committee to amend the Telecommunications Business Act, dubbed the &#8220;Anti-Google law,&#8221; the amendment will come to a final vote in parliament. That vote could come on Wednesday, although South Korean news agency Yonhap reported that parliament would act at a later date. A parliament official told Reuters the office had not yet received [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-798905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-it-2"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=798905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798905\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=798905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=798905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}