{"id":1011965,"date":"2026-06-03T17:04:49","date_gmt":"2026-06-03T11:34:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/?p=1011965"},"modified":"2026-06-03T17:14:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-03T11:44:28","slug":"editorial-may-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/2026\/06\/03\/editorial-may-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Editorial \u2013 MAY 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bharti Airtel&#8217;s launch of its &#8220;Priority Postpaid&#8221; service damages the principles of non-discrimination and net neutrality. India decisively rejected differential Internet access models preempting generational change. By using 5G network slicing to create dedicated network lanes for premium-paying customers, Airtel has effectively introduced a system where superior connectivity is available for a price, while ordinary subscribers are left to compete for the remaining network resources.<\/p>\n<p>Airtel has openly acknowledged that Priority Postpaid customers will receive a superior, more dependable network experience during periods of congestion. In practical terms, this means that when networks are under stress, one class of subscribers will enjoy preferential treatment while millions of prepaid and regular users may experience slower speeds, higher latency, and reduced service quality. Airtel has therefore transformed network quality from a common service obligation into a premium product.<\/p>\n<p>This approach fundamentally negates the letter and spirit of India&#8217;s telecom licensing framework. Telecom operators are required to provide services without discrimination and on the same commercial principles. While limited exceptions exist for specialized services, these were never intended to permit telecom operators to create commercially privileged classes of internet users. The regulatory framework explicitly warns against discriminatory treatment, including preferential speeds and preferential network access.<\/p>\n<p>The implications extend far beyond one tariff plan. It establishes a precedent whereby connectivity itself becomes stratified. Instead of investing in improving network quality for all subscribers, operators are incentivized to reserve the best network experience for those willing to pay a premium. The result is Telecom Apartheid based on economic status. <\/p>\n<p>Equally troubling is the regulatory response. Both DoT and Trai have thus far refrained from taking decisive action. Their silence risks signaling regulatory acceptance of this model. The issue at stake here is whether India will continue to uphold the principle that every subscriber deserves equal access to network resources, or permit telecom operators to create digital fast lanes for a privileged few. If left unchecked, Airtel&#8217;s Priority Postpaid service could become the first step towards a telecom landscape divided by purchasing power, where equal connectivity is replaced by paid privilege and net neutrality becomes little more than a historical commitment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bharti Airtel&#8217;s launch of its &#8220;Priority Postpaid&#8221; service damages the principles of non-discrimination and net neutrality. India decisively rejected differential Internet access models preempting generational change. By using 5G network slicing to create dedicated network lanes for premium-paying customers, Airtel has effectively introduced a system where superior connectivity is available for a price, while ordinary subscribers are left to compete for the remaining network resources. Airtel has openly acknowledged that Priority Postpaid customers will receive a superior, more dependable network experience during periods of congestion. In practical terms, this means that when networks are under stress, one class of subscribers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[109],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1011965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editorial"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1011965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1011965"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1011965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1011966,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1011965\/revisions\/1011966"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1011965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1011965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/telecomlive.in\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1011965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}