When AI enters courtroom, justice must remain human

The Supreme Court’s decision yesterday to set aside orders passed by NCLT and NCLAT on the basis of fake AI-generated citations is a timely warning. It is not a rejection of artificial intelligence. It is a reminder that in matters of law, AI can assist the mind, but it cannot replace judgment. A court system may use machines to become faster, but it cannot allow machines to make it careless.

Read more

You may also like

Comments are closed.

More in IT